Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/20/2022
State v. Howard
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3739
Syllabus
Postconviction relief R.C. 2953.21 successive petition R.C. 2953.23 Brady violation. Trial court correctly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to consider petitioner's successive petition for postconviction relief under R.C. 2953.23(A)(1), and that decision was consistent with the Ohio Supreme Court's analysis in State v. Bethel, 167 Ohio St.3d 362, 2022-Ohio-783, 192 N.E.3d 470.
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Smith v. CainSupreme Court· 2012-01-10· cited 417×
- Joyce v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-02-28· cited 376×
- State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-11-29· cited 208×
- State v. Bethel (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-03-22· cited 161×
- Reynolds v. BudzikOhio Court of Appeals· 1999-12-03· cited 59×
- State ex rel. Summers v. Fox (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-10· cited 30×
- State v. BuehnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-16· cited 19×
- O'Neal v. StateOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-13· cited 14×
- Hassey v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth District, Franklin County· 2018-09-27· cited 13×
- State v. BethelOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-07· cited 10×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-19· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.