Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/30/2017
State v. Howard
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 8742
Syllabus
In self-defense cases, the force used must be no more than is reasonably necessary to repel the threat presented. In this case, because a reasonable jury could have concluded that the defendant continued to fire his gun after the threat had ended, it was not a miscarriage of justice for a jury to have failed to find the defendant acted in self-defense.
Judges: Brunner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- State v. WillifordOhio Supreme Court· 1990-03-14· cited 541×
- State v. ShaneOhio Supreme Court· 1992-05-13· cited 535×
- State v. RobbinsOhio Supreme Court· 1979-05-02· cited 484×
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court· 1997-01-22· cited 266×
- State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court· 1986-01-15· cited 221×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.