State v. Howard
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 692
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in overruling the appellant's pretrial motion to dismiss on statutory speedy-trial grounds. Speedy-trial time properly was tolled between June 25, 2015 (when the appellant moved for a continuance of his scheduled trial) and August 17, 2015 (when trial subsequently was held on the first available date). The appellant's convictions are based on legally sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The State presented circumstantial evidence supporting a reasonable inference that the appellant was one of two perpetrators of a burglary involving theft of firearms. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.