State v. Howard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “no touch” provision of Dallas sexually oriented business ordinance required culpable mental state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Telia D. Casel v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-07-07· cited 21×
• Opinion Number
  Louisiana Attorney General Reports· 2009-11-20

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. O'Brien
  Supreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 3,604×
• New York v. Ferber
  Supreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
• City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-21· cited 1,818×
• Smith v. California
  Supreme Court· 1960-06-13· cited 1,258×
• Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-21· cited 844×
• State v. Moff
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-10-06· cited 633×
• Aguirre v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-12-08· cited 103×
• Hang On, Inc. v. City of Arlington
  Fifth Circuit· 1995-09-15· cited 99×
• 2300, INC. v. City of Arlington, Tex.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1994-11-22· cited 38×
• Kaczmarek v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1999-01-06· cited 21×
• Millennium Restaurants Group, Inc. v. City of Dallas
  N.D. Texas· 2001-10-18· cited 15×
• Ex Parte Smalley
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2005-01-03· cited 7×