State v. Housekeeper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is recognized that the State has the burden of proving each and every element of the offense and if it fails so to do the defendant is entitled to an acquittal” at 140
• \It is recognized that the State has the burden of proving each and every element of the offense and if it fails so to do the defendant is entitled to an acquittal\ at 140

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lamorie
  Utah Supreme Court· 1980-03-28· cited 31×
• State v. Murphy
  Utah Supreme Court· 1980-09-09· cited 23×
• State v. DePlonty
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-12-31· cited 23×
• State v. MacNeill
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2017-03-16· cited 16×
• State v. Calamity
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-03-23· cited 12×
• State v. Laird
  Utah Supreme Court· 1979-10-11· cited 4×
• State v. Dronzank
  Utah Supreme Court· 1983-10-03· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Griffin v. California
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
• Griffin v. California
  Supreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
• State v. Peterson
  Utah Supreme Court· 1969-04-18· cited 13×
• State v. Martinez
  Utah Supreme Court· 1920-06-19· cited 2×