Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/13/2019
State v. Hottenstein
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3690
Syllabus
The statutory \seriousness\ and \recidivism\ factors do not clearly and convincingly fail to support the appellant's individual sentences or his consecutive sentences. The record does not clearly and convincingly fail to support the trial court's statutory findings for imposing consecutive sentences of 12 months and 18 months. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. GoldblumOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-14· cited 31×
- State v. BradyOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-11· cited 5×
- State v. LumfordOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-18· cited 3×
- State v. MurrellOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-09· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.