Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/30/2025
State v. Hoskins
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1946
Syllabus
Appellant's sentence was not contrary to law, and the court considered the principles and purposes of sentencing and the seriousness and recidivism factors in imposing sentence. The trial court's findings in support of imposing consecutive sentences were supported by the record. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court· 2023-10-25· cited 232×
- State v. DorseyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-15· cited 137×
- State v. WorthenOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-13· cited 45×
- State v. HuffmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-02· cited 44×
- State v. FarraOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-29· cited 39×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-19· cited 15×
- State v. KibbleOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-05· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.