Skip to main content

State v. Hoskins

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 1946

Syllabus

Appellant's sentence was not contrary to law, and the court considered the principles and purposes of sentencing and the seriousness and recidivism factors in imposing sentence. The trial court's findings in support of imposing consecutive sentences were supported by the record. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Huffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.