Idaho Supreme Court· 8/13/1998
State v. Hosey
Citations
- 968 P.2d 212
- 132 Idaho 117
- 1998 Ida. LEXIS 103
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ordering that “[t]o determine the extent of the informer privilege, the trial court must-conduct an in camera examination of the evidence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walters, Trout, Johnson, Silak, Schroeder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-03-25· cited 3,599×
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1967-04-24· cited 1,521×
- State v. KopsaIdaho Court of Appeals· 1994-12-20· cited 38×
- State v. FairchildIdaho Court of Appeals· 1992-03-02· cited 35×
- State v. VazquezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-07-22· cited 21×
- State v. DavilaIdaho Court of Appeals· 1995-12-21· cited 18×
- State v. PetrinaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-04-19· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.