Skip to main content
· 9/30/1964

State v. Hoschar

Citations

  • 177 Ohio St. (N.S.) 38

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If the products are closely related, and it is reasonable for consumers to believe the products come from the same source, confusion is more likely.”
  • “[w]e use [these factors] as a guide to determine whether a reasonable jury could find a likelihood of confusion. Factual disputes regarding a single factor are insufficient to support the reversal of summary judgment unless they tilt the entire balance in favor of such a finding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson, Griffith, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Taft, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.