State v. Horsley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the well-established rule of requiring unanimity on the greater offense does not violate due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-05-09· cited 20×
• State v. Leckenby
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-07-27· cited 11×
• State v. Ryel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-10· cited 9×
• Stanfield v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2019-12-03· cited 9×
• Trotter v. Santos
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-05-02· cited 6×
• State v. O'DONNELL
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-02-25· cited 6×
• State v. Dan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-28· cited 1×
• State v. Trevitts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-08-30
• State v. Cornwell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-27
• State v. Decoteau
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-05-02
• State v. Murdoch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-05-02

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Montez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-04-03· cited 170×
• State v. Lee
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1997-08-26· cited 105×
• State v. Steeves
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1896-03-02· cited 83×
• State v. Labanowski
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-09-19· cited 63×
• State v. Ogden
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-07-05· cited 51×
• State v. Allen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-04-22· cited 51×
• State v. Thorp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-04-19· cited 22×
• State v. Amini
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-06-24· cited 20×
• Tsanas v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1978-04-24· cited 8×
• Pharr v. Israel
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-12· cited 3×