State v. Horn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging the defendants’ concession that ORS 166.025 (1)(e) is not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad on its face
• “In order to prevail on a demurrer on constitutional grounds, defendants must show that the statute under which they were charged is overbroad (or vague) on its face”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cantwell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-02-08· cited 35×
• State v. Pyritz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-04-20· cited 20×
• State v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-07-12· cited 4×
• City of Nyssa v. Dufloth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-10-30· cited 2×
• State v. Silver
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-10-09· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Grayned v. City of Rockford
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,586×
• Terminiello v. Chicago
  Supreme Court· 1949-06-13· cited 1,230×
• Schenck v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1919-03-03· cited 1,079×
• State v. Valdez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-03-24· cited 229×
• State v. Spencer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-06-03· cited 78×
• State v. Stark
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-11-05· cited 18×
• State v. Joseph
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1962-05-16· cited 8×
• State v. Green
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-12-12· cited 6×