State v. Hope
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3719
Syllabus
The trial court properly denied appellant's motion to suppress where the trooper who pulled appellant over for speeding gained a reasonable articulable suspicion that criminal activity was occurring. The trial court's sentence was contrary to law because the trial court failed to consider the purposes and principles of sentencing and other required statutory factors before sentencing.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 2,340×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. RobinetteOhio Supreme Court· 1997-11-12· cited 619×
- City of Bowling Green v. GodwinOhio Supreme Court· 2006-07-26· cited 120×
- State v. AhlersOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-09· cited 107×
- State v. DurhamOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-28· cited 68×
- State v. CaseyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-16· cited 35×
- State v. McGowan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-05-17· cited 32×
- State v. McGowanOhio Supreme Court· 2016-05-17· cited 31×
- State v. LynnOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-20· cited 17×
- State v. VangOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-22· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.