State v. Holt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the charges in two possession of pornography cases were the same conduct because the charges were the same, the kind of material allegedly illegally possessed was the same, and the date of possession was the same
• holding that the charges in two possession of pornography cases were the same conduct because the charges were the same, the kind of material allegedly illegally possessed was the same, and the date of possession was the same

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Downing
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-06-15· cited 22×
• State v. Downing
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-07-20· cited 17×
• State of Washington v. Tommy D. Canfield
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-05-21· cited 4×
• State v. Dixon
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-12-16· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Russell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-01-10· cited 28×
• State v. Erickson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-12-01· cited 25×
• State v. McNeil
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-07-13· cited 19×