State v. HOLSTON LAND COMPANY, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that when read together, a grant accompanied by a legend describing a “tract of marsh land” and a plat referencing “two hundred acres of marsh land” evinced a “clear intent to convey the disputed tidelands ... to the usual low water mark”
• finding the term “marsh land” in a conveyance from the King sufficient to overcome the State’s presumptive title to land below the high water mark
• finding the term \marsh land\ in a conveyance from the King sufficient to overcome the State's presumptive title to land below the high water mark
• “The law in South Carolina is well settled that a grant conveying ‘marshland’ can give rise to private ownership of property to the mean low water mark.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).