Skip to main content

State v. Holmes

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 2086

Syllabus

A defendant appeals his convictions for rape and gross sexual imposition. There was no prosecutorial misconduct in calling for justice for the victim during closing argument and where the state published a recording of the victim's statement that the defendant had agreed could be admitted into evidence. Related claims of ineffective assistance of counsel were meritless.

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.