State v. Holmes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a sufficieney-of-the-evidence argument was not preserved by a motion for directed verdict made during closing argument
• holding that a directed-verdiet motion madeja during closing arguments was untimely
• “In order to preserve the question of the sufficiency of the evidence, Holmes should have made his motion for directed verdict at the close of all the evidence before closing arguments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Raymond v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-09-25· cited 61×
• Hamm v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-03-16· cited 36×
• McClina v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-10-09· cited 28×
• T.C. v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2010-05-14· cited 20×
• Holiday Inn Franchising, Inc. v. Hotel Associates, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2011-02-23· cited 13×
• Grube v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2010-04-15· cited 5×
• Lewis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2009-06-24· cited 2×
• N.L. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2017-04-12· cited 2×
• TC v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2010-05-14