Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1/24/1995
State v. Holmberg
Citations
- 527 N.W.2d 100
- 1995 Minn. App. LEXIS 89
- 1995 WL 23982
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing a challenge to denial of dismissal for lack of probable cause following conviction as a sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge
- “An instruction need not be given if it is not warranted by either the facts or the relevant case law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lansing, Klaphake, Mulally
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. OlhausenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2003-09-30· cited 3×
- State v. TomlinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-06-27· cited 2×
- State of Minnesota v. Thomas Joseph ShaneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-07-05
- State of Minnesota v. Isabella Anne GendronCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-06-17
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1952-01-07· cited 3,056×
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-03-01· cited 2,149×
- Arcara v. Cloud Books, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-07-07· cited 341×
- Vance v. Universal Amusement Co.Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 270×
- City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court· 1978-04-24· cited 125×
- State v. RuudSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-10-21· cited 56×
- Sommer v. Superior Court of CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1993-01-11· cited 56×
- State v. WelkeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-03-01· cited 52×
- State v. KrawskySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-08-05· cited 52×
- State v. BlasusSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-09-15· cited 49×
- United States v. BradyD. Colorado· 1989-04-06· cited 31×
- State Ex Rel. Hastings v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1962-07-20· cited 23×
- United States v. James Vincent AlbertiniNinth Circuit· 1987-10-15· cited 21×
- State v. GumingaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-10-31· cited 20×
- Hvamstad v. SuhlerD. Minnesota· 1989-12-29· cited 15×
- Alexander v. ThornburghD. Minnesota· 1989-05-05· cited 13×
- State v. CastellanoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-09-28· cited 10×
- State v. KagerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-02-25· cited 8×
- State v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-10-22· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.