State v. Holman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• challenge to the de facto judge’s authority must be made before the adverse determination is made
• “all orders, judgments, and decrees made, given, and ren- dered by [de facto judge] are conclusive, valid, and binding upon all parties”
• “A party cannot be permitted to wait until an adverse judgment or decree is rendered against him and then claim that the judge before whom his cause was tried was powerless to determine the issues involved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McDonnell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-20· cited 38×
• State v. Vogh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-02-20· cited 20×
• Gantenbein v. West
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1914-12-22· cited 12×
• Phy v. Wright
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1915-02-09· cited 6×
• STATE Ex Rel WERNMARK v. HOPKINS
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1958-06-04· cited 3×
• Smith v. Kozer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1924-10-13· cited 3×
• Dept. of Human Services v. J. H. (A177299)
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-06-08· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Biggs v. McBride
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1889-06-20· cited 66×
• Lang v. Mayor of Bayonne
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1907-07-02· cited 48×
• State v. George
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1892-03-22· cited 31×
• State v. Compson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1898-09-14· cited 27×
• Branch v. McCormick's Estate
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1914-10-20· cited 22×
• State ex rel. Bockmeier v. Ely
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1907-11-07· cited 17×