Supreme Court of Connecticut· 12/1/1959
State v. Holloway
Citations
- 147 Conn. 22
- 156 A.2d 466
- 1959 Conn. LEXIS 247
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[w]aiver may be implied where the defendant, in court, interposes no objection to a continuance”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baldwin, King, Murphy, Mellitz, Shea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-12-09· cited 134×
- State v. L'HEUREUXSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-05-07· cited 64×
- State v. DoucetteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1959-12-30· cited 46×
- State v. EarnestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-07-25· cited 30×
- Wexler Construction Co. v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1962-07-05· cited 21×
- Autrey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals· 1967-06-30· cited 15×
- United States Ex Rel. Holloway v. ReinckeD. Connecticut· 1964-04-24· cited 15×
- United States Ex Rel. Smith v. ReinckeD. Connecticut· 1965-03-22· cited 13×
- State v. CoteConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-06-05· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Leon v. BakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-12-09· cited 4×
- State v. SaundersConnecticut Appellate Court· 1963-07-24· cited 3×
- State v. PlourdeConnecticut Appellate Court· 1965-09-03· cited 3×
- State v. KelleyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1964-06-08
- State v. WichmanConnecticut Appellate Court· 1969-12-12
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.