Tennessee Supreme Court· 3/28/1983

State v. Hollingsworth

Citations

647 S.W.2d 937
1983 Tenn. LEXIS 631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the court may look beyond the plea agreement to consider the “true nature of the offense committed”
stating that in matters entrusted to the discretion of the trial court, “the appellate court is not authorized to substitute its judgment for that of the trial court when the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence”
stating that in matters entrusted to the discretion of the trial court, “the appellate court is not authorized to substitute its judgment for that of the trial court when the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence”
finding that it was proper for the trial court to deny probation to a defendant convicted of robbery and attempt to commit a felony when the facts of his case demonstrated that he was guilty of armed robbery and citing State v. Welch, 565 S.W.2d 492 (Tenn. 1978
“It is . . . proper for a trial court to look behind the plea bargain and consider the true nature of the offenses committed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cooper, Fones, Brock, Harbison, Drowota

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Other cases named State v. Hollingsworth

49 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.