Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2/10/1987
State v. Hole
Citations
- 400 N.W.2d 430
- 1987 Minn. App. LEXIS 4045
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that district court did not abuse its discretion by not permitting oral testimony at hearing on motion for new trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Foley, Randall, Waived, Wozniak
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-12-01· cited 321×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-06-27· cited 82×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-04-20· cited 57×
- State v. MathiasenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1964-03-06· cited 47×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-04-08· cited 35×
- State v. HouleSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-07-29· cited 34×
- State v. HagenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-01-22· cited 25×
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-03-22· cited 25×
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.