Court of Appeals of Utah· 7/23/1998
State v. Holden
Citations
- 964 P.2d 318
- 348 Utah Adv. Rep. 17
- 1998 Utah App. LEXIS 59
- 1998 WL 409432
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing a determination regarding intent as “the quintessential factual question” (cleaned up)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkins, Jackson, Orme
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In the Interest of A.C.C.Utah Supreme Court· 2002-03-05· cited 10×
- Salt Lake City v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2000-06-29· cited 6×
- Hudspeth v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-06-20· cited 6×
- PC Scale, Inc. v. Roll Off Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2010-11-03· cited 4×
- State v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2006-06-02· cited 2×
- State v. ChaconCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2026-02-12· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.