State v. Hogue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that question whether defendant waived counsel at first arraignment was moot because defendant was represented by counsel at rearraignment
• holding that question whether defendant waived counsel at first arraignment was moot because defendant was represented by counsel at rearraignment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Van Dyke
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-10-27· cited 21×
• Weakley v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1998-05-08· cited 19×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boykin v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
• State v. Griswold
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-07-23· cited 75×
• Sanchez v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1960-02-23· cited 26×
• People v. Nunez
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-05-15· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. McCoy
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-03-23· cited 10×