Skip to main content

State v. Hogle

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 4096

Syllabus

No non-frivolous issues exist for appellate review in this Anders appeal. After Appellant's sentence was affirmed on his direct appeal, Appellant filed a motion to correct sentence. The issues raised in the motion are barred by res judicata. The trial court's correction of a clerical error in the judgment entry to conform to what actually happened in the sentencing transcript does not raise an issue of arguable merit for appeal. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.