Skip to main content

State v. Hobbs

Citations

  • 705 S.E.2d 147
  • 288 Ga. 551
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 78
  • 2010 Ga. LEXIS 885

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on a line of decisions traceable to Jupitz, and holding a trial court must \explain how good character evidence could generate reasonable doubt sufficient to acquit\
  • “Good character is a substantive fact at trial, and can by itself create reasonable doubt as to a defendant’s guilt and lead to an acquittal.”
  • “Good character . . . can by itself create a reasonable doubt as to a defendant’s guilt and lead to an acquittal.”
  • “‘Good character is a substantive fact at trial, and can by itself create reasonable doubt as to a defendant’s guilt and lead to an acquittal.’” (citation omitted)
  • “[W]hen instructing on good 4 character, the trial court is expected to tell the jury that good character is a substantive fact which may create reasonable doubt leading to an acquittal.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham, Thompson, Melton, Nahmias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.