State v. Hlinovsky

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 3299

Syllabus

Challenge to whether guilty plea was made knowingly and intelligently; one nonconstitutional provision of Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) is a requirement to insure defendant has an understanding of the nature of the charges; defendant commented during allocution he was dissatisfied with conviction for failure to appear because he was hospitalized at the time; defendant's dissatisfaction with criminal does not show lack of understanding of the nature of the charge; failure to make R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) consecutive sentence findings; defendant cannot appeal consecutive sentence that is part of an agreed sentence; R.C. 2953.08(D)(1); judgment affirmed.