State v. Hjelmstad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the difference between the informant’s equivocal statement that the driver was “possibly drunk” versus a more definite statement of “drunk” was a distinction of “little significance”
• concluding that the difference between the informant’s equivocal statement that the driver was “possibly drunk” versus a more definite statement of “drunk” was a distinction of “little significance”
• noting that a four second delay, “without more, does not demonstrate erratic driving”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).