State v. Hinze

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 2602

Syllabus

At sentencing, the court failed to calculate appellant's maximum term pursuant to the Reagan Tokes Act, and the maximum term included in the judgment entry of conviction was incorrect. The judgment entry was also internally inconsistent as to the concurrent and consecutive terms imposed. Finally, the trial court failed to comply with the notification requirements in R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c). Judgment reversed in part and remanded solely for purposes of resentencing. Judgment affirmed in all other respects.