Nebraska Supreme Court· 11/6/1987
State v. Hinton
Citations
- 415 N.W.2d 138
- 226 Neb. 787
- 1987 Neb. LEXIS 1073
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “since requiring interim reports is not mandated by statute and rests with the discretion of the judge issuing wiretap orders, waiver of the requirement or determination of the consequences of failing to follow the order in that regard also rests with that judge’s discretion”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Colwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Eric J. Moore Craig C. Robinson Ray L. Williams Keith L. Cooks Lashonda R. Robinson Sherice Y. ThompsonEighth Circuit· 1995-01-19· cited 53×
- State v. StrohlNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-01-08· cited 51×
- United States v. Rudolph T. CovosEighth Circuit· 1989-04-11· cited 42×
- State v. MyersNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-12-10· cited 39×
- State v. NoltNebraska Supreme Court· 2018-02-09· cited 26×
- United States v. Willie J. Brown, United States of America v. Theodore R. Vaughn, United States of America v. James R. SheilEighth Circuit· 1991-08-06· cited 12×
- State v. ChampouxNebraska Court of Appeals· 1996-10-15· cited 10×
- State v. NashNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-09-01· cited 9×
- State v. QuinnSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-01-31· cited 7×
- United States v. FeisteEighth Circuit· 1992-04-15· cited 5×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1928-06-04· cited 2,291×
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 1,364×
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court· 1977-12-07· cited 871×
- United States v. ChavezSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 348×
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-08-18· cited 319×
- Mills v. RogersSupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 258×
- Dawkins v. Nabisco, Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 199×
- People v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-11-09· cited 182×
- Barker v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1986-04-28· cited 174×
- People v. SporlederSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-06-27· cited 136×
- United States v. GarciaEighth Circuit· 1986-02-25· cited 120×
- Commonwealth v. BeaufordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-11-29· cited 83×
- United States v. William c.wolkEighth Circuit· 1972-08-30· cited 61×
- United States v. Wayne WomochilEighth Circuit· 1986-01-30· cited 50×
- State v. BrennenNebraska Supreme Court· 1984-10-12· cited 44×
- United States v. Max Abramson, United States of America v. Frank Bonfiglio, United States of America v. Paul Cappellano, Jr.Eighth Circuit· 1977-06-27· cited 41×
- State v. BurkeNebraska Supreme Court· 1987-06-12· cited 40×
- United States v. CaplanE.D. Michigan· 1966-07-06· cited 37×
- State v. HavlatNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-04-25· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.