State v. Hinkle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court “erred in failing to adhere to the directives of Section 558.021 ... when it permitted evidence that Defendant was a prior and persistent offender after submission to the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Michael W. Johnson
  Eighth Circuit· 2005-08-17· cited 54×
• State v. Teer
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2009-01-27· cited 47×
• State v. Holleran
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-08-01· cited 19×
• State v. Cullen
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-03-27· cited 17×
• State v. Campbell
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2004-10-29· cited 15×
• People v. Rushing
  California Court of Appeal· 2011-07-20· cited 15×
• State v. Bracken
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-11-30· cited 12×
• State v. Griffith
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-05-10· cited 11×
• State of Missouri v. Willie Randle
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-03-10· cited 11×
• State v. Hyman
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-01-18· cited 6×
• Purvis v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-02-28· cited 3×
• Unnamed case
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-08-23
• United States v. Michael Johnson
  Eighth Circuit· 2005-08-17
• Hinkle v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-08-29