Supreme Court of Iowa· 5/21/1975

State v. Hinkle

Citations

229 N.W.2d 744
1975 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1099

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Assuming arguendo a proper objection had been timely made, defendant complains of a self- inflicted wound . . . . This self-induced error, if error at all, cannot be asserted by defendant.”
“We further note our rule there is no reversible error if trial court’s ruling which admitted the evidence in controversy may be sustained on any ground.”
\there is no reversible error if trial court's ruling which admitted the evidence in controversy may be sustained on any ground\
“there is no reversible error if trial court’s ruling which admitted the evidence in controversy may be sustained on any ground”
presumption of prejudice is rebutted when substantially the same evidence is in the record without objection
victim’s fear of the accused, communicated by the victim to a third person, held admissible as a part of the res gestae, particularly where the killer’s identity is in issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Legrand, Rees, Reynoldson, Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.