State v. Hills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant protected from overly broad application of statute prohibiting “harassment” by court’s instruction that defendant must have a conscious object to harass
• harassment statute, not protective order, defines proscribed conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McLaughlin
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2002-04-08· cited 23×
• State v. Witham
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2005-06-29· cited 19×
• Cates v. Donahue
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2007-03-01· cited 14×
• Smith v. Welch
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-08-17· cited 12×
• State of Maine v. Colby D. Conroy
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2020-01-30· cited 12×
• State v. McGillicuddy
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-07-22· cited 9×
• State v. Pettengill
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-01-10· cited 6×
• State v. Zurmiller
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-02-28· cited 6×
• State v. Ilsley
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1991-07-26· cited 5×
• State v. Haley
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1993-08-05· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Barry
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1985-07-15· cited 259×
• State v. Cropley
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1988-07-13· cited 24×
• State v. Carisio
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1988-12-21· cited 14×
• State v. Gray
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-02-09· cited 8×