State v. Hill
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 2813
Syllabus
CRIM.R. 11(C)(2)(a) GUILTY PLEA KNOWING, INTELLIGENT, VOLUNTARY POSTRELEASE CONTROL R.C. 2929.141(A). The defendant-appellant's guilty plea was not knowing, intelligent, or voluntary because the trial court failed to substantially comply with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) since it did not advise the defendant-appellant of its authority to revoke his postrelease control (in a prior case) and impose a prison term consecutively to any term of imprisonment imposed for the new felony offenses.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
- State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 403×
- State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-12-21· cited 173×
- State v. MontgomeryOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-28· cited 20×
- State v. MylesOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-15· cited 7×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-23· cited 4×
- State v. BattleOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-14· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.