State v. Hill
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1556
Syllabus
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – FIFTH AMENDMENT: Defendant did not demonstrate that the trial court committed plain error in allowing a defense witness to assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination during defendant's assault bench trial where defense attorney's reference to the witness as the \candy lady\ during cross-examination of the victim raised the Fifth Amendment concerns in the first place, and when the witness invoked her Fifth Amendment privilege, defendant did not object to the witness's refusal to answer the questions, and defendant did not proffer any further questions of the witness.
Judges: Winkler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 2,510×
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-05-28· cited 1,874×
- State v. Arnold (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-04-20· cited 79×
- State v. LandrumOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-07· cited 17×
- Nunez Vega v. TivurcioOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-16· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.