State v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when the trial court amends an information over the state’s objection, the trial court has encroached upon the prosecutor’s constitutional duties and breached the separation of powers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Murphy
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-11-08· cited 29×
• State v. Vasquez-Aerreola
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-03-17· cited 17×
• State v. Knight
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-10-03· cited 14×
• State v. Brooks
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-02-03· cited 12×
• State v. D.S.
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2011-02-09· cited 12×
• Renfro v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-01-29· cited 5×
• I.K. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2018-12-05· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Edmonson
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-07-01· cited 81×
• Gran v. Hale
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1988-02-22· cited 30×
• Petition of United States of America for a Writ of Mandamus
  Ninth Circuit· 1962-08-16· cited 13×
• State v. Brooks
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-02-05· cited 10×
• State v. Laury
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-04-15· cited 5×