Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/25/1992
State v. Hill
Citations
- 112 Or. App. 213
- 827 P.2d 951
- 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 574
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dispositional departure from probationary sentence was warranted where defendant had previously committed crimes while on probation
- fact that the defendant had committed many crimes and would not be deterred from criminal activity by being placed on probation is an adequate basis for a dispositional departure from presumptive probation
- prior criminal judicial sanctions failed to deter
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deits, Joseph, Richardson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SpeedisOregon Supreme Court· 2011-06-30· cited 44×
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-11-16· cited 39×
- State v. Zavala-RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-11-04· cited 14×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-03-31· cited 10×
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-03-25· cited 9×
- State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-12-26· cited 8×
- State v. Morales-AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-07-07· cited 4×
- State v. PetrieCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-03-06· cited 4×
- State v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-09-16· cited 2×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.