Wisconsin Supreme Court· 6/15/1872
State v. Hill
Citations
- 30 Wis. 416
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- if state gives portion of previous conversations by competent testimony, defendant has right to introduce whole conversation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lyon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1877-03-03· cited 48×
- People v. TildenIllinois Supreme Court· 1909-12-22· cited 13×
- Gillespie v. WalkerFourth Circuit· 1924-02-06· cited 12×
- State v. ShearWisconsin Supreme Court· 1881-03-02· cited 11×
- Rohl v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1979-04-06· cited 10×
- People v. HerzogNew York County Courts· 1905-04-15· cited 3×
- Smith v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court· 1872-06-15· cited 2×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Weinzorpflin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1844-07-11· cited 63×
- State v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1846-12-15· cited 22×
- Rheinstrom v. ConeWisconsin Supreme Court· 1870-06-15· cited 9×
- Hayworth v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1860-08-23· cited 9×
- John v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1868-10-15· cited 8×
- State v. AnsonWisconsin Supreme Court· 1866-06-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.