State v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We have not yet determined whether equitable tolling applies to postconviction proceedings under § 29-3001, and we need not do so here.” (footnote omitted)
• in affirming denial of postconviction relief without evidentiary hearing based on § 29-3001(4), Nebraska Supreme Court noted in statement of facts that defendant “did not mention tolling or the timeliness of his motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Boeggeman
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2024-05-10· cited 9×
• State v. Scoville
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2022-08-09

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pennsylvania v. Finley
  Supreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 3,807×
• State v. Robertson
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2016-07-01· cited 344×
• State v. Lotter
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2009-09-04· cited 120×
• State v. Edwards
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2018-11-16· cited 48×
• State v. Victor
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-01-29· cited 45×
• State v. Huggins
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2015-07-24· cited 19×
• State v. Koch
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2019-09-27· cited 12×
• State v. Harris
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2020-09-25· cited 12×
• State v. Smith
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2014-08-08· cited 10×
• State v. Mata
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2019-10-25· cited 8×