State v. Hill

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 3271

Syllabus

JURISDICTION—CRIM.R. 11—POSTRELEASE CONTROL: The common pleas court properly dismissed defendant's Crim.R. 32.1 motion seeking to withdraw his guilty pleas based on the trial court's failure to advise him consistent with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) that his sentence would include postrelease control: the common pleas court had no jurisdiction to entertain the motion after the convictions based upon those pleas had been affirmed in the direct appeal, because the motion's noncompliance claim did not depend for its resolution upon evidence outside the record of the proceedings leading to those convictions and thus could have been raised on direct appeal and the trial court's error was not subject to correction under the jurisdiction to correct a void judgment, because the error rendered defendant's convictions voidable, not void, when the trial court had personal jurisdiction over defendant and jurisdiction to accept his guilty pleas and to convict him upon those pleas.