State v. Hill

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 7

Syllabus

The trial court fully complied with its obligation under Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) to advise appellant of the increased maximum penalty created by his post-release control status. Also, despite the slight variation between the indictment language and the State's factual statement in support of the guilty pleas, the record establishes that appellant subjectively understood the nature of the drug possession offenses to which he pleaded guilty. Judgment affirmed. (Donovan, J., concurring in judgment only.)