State v. Hill
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 698
Syllabus
Crim.R. 29 theft manifest weight R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12 allied offenses. State presented sufficient evidence establishing defendant as the suspect state presented sufficient evidence of theft as complaining witness was the manager of the service station whose funds were taken sufficient evidence supported conviction for theft of a dangerous drug under R.C. 4729.01 and 3719.01 theft and criminal damaging convictions were not against manifest weight of the evidence maximum and consecutive sentences were not unlawful theft of car, and thefts from trunk and glove box were not allied offenses of similar import.
Judges: Blackmon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court· 1978-09-27· cited 1,353×
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. LoganOhio Supreme Court· 1979-12-19· cited 696×
- State v. A.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-20· cited 114×
- State v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-14· cited 30×
- State v. BaileyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-23· cited 24×
- State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-28· cited 23×
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-02-04· cited 16×
- State v. TorresOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-14· cited 13×
- State v. A.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-10-18· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.