State v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[W]e conclude that one of these fatal variance arguments is meritorious and exercise our discretion under Rule 2 to suspend the appellate preservation rules and consider that argument[.]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cozart
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-06-19· cited 11×
• State v. Campbell
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-02-06· cited 9×
• State v. McNair
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-04-18· cited 8×
• State v. Young
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-08-02· cited 5×
• State v. Nickens
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-11-06· cited 5×
• State v. Morrison
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-08-04
• State v. McKoy
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-06-01
• State v. Greenfield
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2025-02-19

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Washington
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2000-12-29· cited 57×
• State v. Pender
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2015-09-01· cited 20×