Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 4/22/1992
State v. Hill
Citations
- 606 A.2d 793
- 1992 Me. LEXIS 87
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that officer’s testimony that rear license plate was unilluminated supported a reasonable suspicion
- noting that a request to see a drivers license was a “minimal further intrusion” and. did not require a reasonable articulable suspicion, so long as the initial stop was supported by a reasonable articulable suspicion
- determining after valid stop for mistaken traffic violation, asking for license was minimal intrusion and did not violate Fourth Amendment
- determining after valid stop for mistaken traffic violation, asking for license was minimal intrusion and did not violate Fourth Amendment
- determining after valid stop for mistaken traffic violation, asldng for license was minimal intrusion and did not violate Fourth Amendment
- determining after valid stop for mistaken traffic violation, asking for license was minimal intrusion and did not violate Fourth Amendment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wathen, Roberts, Glassman, Clifford, Collins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State of Iowa v. Jayel Antrone ColemanSupreme Court of Iowa· 2017-02-10· cited 90×
- People v. RedingerSupreme Court of Colorado· 1995-10-30· cited 65×
- McGaughey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2001-11-09· cited 60×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1997-04-18· cited 56×
- State v. GulickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2000-10-06· cited 53×
- State v. DiazSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-05-15· cited 51×
- State v. VentoSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-12-22· cited 36×
- State v. DubeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-03-01· cited 32×
- State v. CusackSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-10-27· cited 22×
- Holland v. City of PortlandFirst Circuit· 1996-12-06· cited 20×
- State v. BolducSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1998-12-03· cited 19×
- State v. LangloisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2005-01-06· cited 17×
- State v. HuetherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2000-04-07· cited 15×
- State v. StoreySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1998-06-26· cited 12×
- State of Maine v. Adam D. GerrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2016-11-08· cited 12×
- State of Maine v. Joshua LovellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2022-09-08· cited 6×
- State of Maine v. David L. VioletteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2016-05-03· cited 2×
- State of Maine v. Amanda Bennett-RobersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2019-04-04· cited 2×
- State v. Bennett-RobersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2019-04-04· cited 2×
- Samuel Griffin Hart v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2007-09-20
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 2,679×
- United States v. Stephen Joseph WalkerFirst Circuit· 1991-01-10· cited 85×
- State v. BoilardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1985-03-15· cited 48×
- State v. CloutierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1988-07-29· cited 48×
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1985-07-03· cited 41×
- Emil Carsetti v. State of MaineFirst Circuit· 1991-05-14· cited 31×
- State v. GarlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-09-06· cited 28×
- State v. CarsettiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1988-02-03· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.