State v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellate court implies that due diligence, under even article 709(3), is exercised in some cases by merely requesting the subpoena

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jefferson
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2005-12-21· cited 47×
• State v. Landry
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1991-06-27· cited 17×
• State v. Peterson
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1993-05-27· cited 10×
• State v. Nicholas
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1999-04-28· cited 10×
• State v. Juengain
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2010-01-20· cited 9×
• State v. Duplessis
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2001-03-28· cited 6×
• State v. Garcia
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1989-03-14· cited 1×
• State v. Thomas
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2014-04-30
• State v. Hill
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1989-01-27

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Latin
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1982-04-05· cited 71×
• State v. Washington
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1981-11-16· cited 53×
• State v. Clark
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1983-08-15· cited 35×
• State v. Mizell
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-12-13· cited 18×
• State v. Lee
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-01-12· cited 13×
• State v. Burns
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1987-02-25· cited 11×
• State v. Williams
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1988-02-03· cited 8×
• State v. Hogan
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1981-09-08· cited 5×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1988-09-09· cited 3×
• State v. Clark
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1983-11-28· cited 1×
• State v. Burns
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1987-05-08· cited 1×