State v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• A defendant should not be required to defend against every aspersion, only those things he is charged with

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Roque
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2006-08-14· cited 207×
• State v. Hines
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-09-09· cited 16×
• State v. Brydges
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-08-24· cited 10×
• State v. Kelly
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-05-15· cited 10×
• State v. McClellan
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-04-10· cited 5×
• State v. Tovar
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-12-02· cited 3×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Singleton
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1947-07-11· cited 87×
• Walker v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1921-10-29· cited 19×