Skip to main content

State v. Hill

Citations

  • 140 N.W.2d 731
  • 258 Iowa 932
  • 1966 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 762

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that even where error is not preserved, “if it appears the State’s evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to it, does not furnish substantial support for the verdict,” 13 then “the case must be reversed”
  • including pocketknives in a list of items “which are manufactured and generally used for peaceful and proper purposes”
  • reversing conviction for carrying concealed weapon where state failed to offer proof that defendant intended to use as weapons two knives, both of which would lock and had 3 5/8-inch blades, found on defendant's person
  • “It has been said, and we agree, that the character of a dangerous weapon attaches by adoption when the instrument is applied or is carried for use against another in furtherance of an assault.”
  • “It has been said, and we agree, that the character of a dangerous weapon attaches by adoption when the instrument is applied or is carried for use against another in furtherance of an assault.”
  • “Whether or not such implements are offensive or dangerous weapons, within the meaning of those terms as used in [the Code], would then depend upon the use which the carrier made or intended to make of 6 them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.