District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/7/1987
State v. Hill
Citations
- 504 So. 2d 407
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court reversibly erred in declining to decide critical issue of whether taped conversation occurred inside or outside defendant's home, and whether conversation took place with State's witness' consent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. John Katsougrakis, John HiotisSecond Circuit· 1983-08-12· cited 134×
- People v. RosotoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-08-02· cited 106×
- State v. SarmientoSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-01-15· cited 82×
- Joseph Thorton Louis v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryFifth Circuit· 1980-11-19· cited 80×
- United States v. Daniel King Brainard, United States of America v. Halton Q. Bittick, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 1983-01-13· cited 59×
- Blackwell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-05-10· cited 48×
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-06-20· cited 45×
- Putnal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-06-15· cited 44×
- United States v. AtkinsThird Circuit· 1977-06-08· cited 41×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-04-21· cited 28×
- Maugeri v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-18· cited 24×
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-07-15· cited 23×
- People v. CollupCalifornia Supreme Court· 1946-03-28· cited 20×
- State v. GarciaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-11-02· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.