Ohio Supreme Court· 8/3/1994
State v. Hill
Citations
- 1994 Ohio 12
- 70 Ohio St. 3d 25
Syllabus
Criminal law—Drug offenses—Forfeiture of property relating to felony drug abuse offense—R.C. 2925.42—Prior to entering order of forfeiture, trial court must make an independent determination whether forfeiture of that property is an \excessive fine\ prohibited by the Excessive Fine Clauses of the Ohio and United States Constitutions.
Judges: Douglas, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 1,908×
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court· 1993-12-13· cited 1,133×
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 628×
- Republic National Bank of Miami v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-12-14· cited 342×
- Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1993-08-11· cited 279×
- United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court· 1993-02-24· cited 246×
- State v. PerrymanOhio Supreme Court· 1976-12-29· cited 170×
- City of Toledo v. ReasonoverOhio Supreme Court· 1965-12-29· cited 165×
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court· 1994-08-03· cited 143×
- United States v. James E. BusherNinth Circuit· 1987-05-26· cited 115×
- State v. LilliockOhio Supreme Court· 1982-04-28· cited 113×
- Department of Liquor Control v. Sons of Italy Lodge 0917Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-12-30· cited 72×
- State v. BaumholtzOhio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 30×
- State v. HooperOhio Supreme Court· 1979-03-21· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.