Supreme Court of North Carolina· 6/5/1849
State v. . Hildreth
Citations
- 31 N.C. 440
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- arguing strongly that statements of existing state of mind should be admitted even when made by accused after commission of crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ruffin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Levering v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1909-03-10· cited 80×
- Fleming v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-14· cited 40×
- Combs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1928-05-22· cited 28×
- Luttrell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1933-06-23· cited 17×
- Landrum v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1906-10-11· cited 13×
- State v. . RhyneSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1891-09-05· cited 7×
- Hopewell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-06-25· cited 4×
- Steel v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1931-09-17· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.