State v. Higgins
Citations
- 51 S.C. 51
- 38 L.R.A. 561
- 28 S.E. 15
- 1897 S.C. LEXIS 55
Syllabus
<p>1. Constitution — Fishing.—The act entitled “An act to further regulate fishing for profit in the waters of this State,” 22Stat., 218, is contrary to the provisions of art. I., sec. 5, and art. III., sec. 34, subs. VII. and XI., of Constitution of 1895.</p> <p>2. Arrest — Warrant—Constitution.—An arrest made under a warrant based on a statement of facts supported neither by oath nor affirmation, is illegal, and contrary to art. I., sec. 16, of Con. 1895.</p>
Judges: McIver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Harper v. GallowaySupreme Court of Florida· 1909-06-15· cited 75×
- McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1989-12-22· cited 66×
- Mills Mill v. HawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1957-06-19· cited 27×
- Barker v. State Fish CommissionWashington Supreme Court· 1915-11-10· cited 20×
- Harvey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1928-10-26· cited 13×
- Ex Parte KlughSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1925-07-15· cited 13×
- McDonald & Johnson v. Southern Express Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina· 1904-12-30· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.